Earlier in the week, our microbe underwent a Catalase Test
to determine whether or not there was activity or a reaction. The catalase test
is used to determine whether or not there is enzyme catalase in the tested
bacteria. Catalase is produced in situations of oxidative stress where it will
facilitate cellular detoxification and when it correlates with pathogenicity in
bacteria (lab handout). Some microbes might have evolved to have a catalase
activity as a response to the oxidative damage of hydrogen peroxide to keep
them from being killed off. In our catalase test of our soil microbe, we
dropped 1 drop of 3% H2O2 onto our bacteria and waited
for a reaction. Our soil microbe reacted to the H2O2 ,
leading us to believe that our bacterium resulted in a positive reaction. We
compared our slides with a positive control, Staphylococcus epidermis as well as to a negative control, E. faecalis. Below is a picture of the
reaction of our soil microbe in the catalase test. Our reaction was not large,
however, it reacted to the H2O2, leading us to believe
there is the catalase enzyme in our bacterium.
Catalase Reaction
We also performed a Triple Sugar Iron Test (TSI) on our soil
bacterium to determine carbohydrate fermentation and hydrogen sulfide
production. This test differentiates bacteria according to how they ferment
lactose, glucose, and sucrose. Bacteria can metabolize carbohydrates in two
ways: aerobically or fermentatively. This test will helpE. coli, B. megaterium,
P. areuginosa, and P. vulgaris.
us decide according to
the resulting color how our soil microbe metabolizes carbohydrates. The agar in
the tube is defined as a differential medium and will select for carbohydrate
fermentation and hydrogen sulfide production. Four controls were tested against
our soil microbe:
Bacterium
|
Tube Reaction
|
Reaction Color
|
E. coli
|
Acid/Acid
|
Yellow
|
B. megaterium
|
Acid/No Change
|
Pink on Bottom
|
P. areuginosa
|
Alkaline/Alkaline
|
Dark
|
P. vulgaris
|
Acid/Acid + H2S
|
Yellow over Black
|
??? Our Soil
Microbe ???
|
|
|
Below are pictures indicating the result of our Triple Sugar
Iron Test for our controls and for our unknown soil microbe. The controls
behaved as expected according to observations of the tubes with the TSI agar
and from the lab handout. Our tube with our unknown bacterium in it had a pink
bottom with a little yellow on the slant. The control most similar to our
unknown bacterium is B. megaterium.
There was no evidence of hydrogen sulfide production, as there was no observed
blackening on the butt of the tube. The butt of our tube was pink, leaving us
to believe that there was no yellow or black coloration and no hydrogen sulfide
production. According to our initial observation after 24 hours at 37°C,
our soil microbe is a glucose fermenter. Our tube reaction is alkaline over acidic
(K/A), meaning that our bacteria can only metabolize glucose. Both aerobic and
anaerobic metabolism can be used to produce ATP and pyruvate. Glucose is
consumed by our bacterium around 18 hours and the amino acids were used as an energy
source on the slant in the form or aerobic metabolism. The butt stays acidic
due to the stable acid end-products of the Embden=Meyerhof-Parnas pathway that
metabolizes glucose.
B. megaterium |
E. coli |
P. areuginosa |
P. vulgaris |
Unknown Soil Microbe |
Unknown Soil Microbe |
Unknown Soil Microbe |
According to the dichotomous key, we can begin eliminating
ideas and narrowing down our guesses on what our bacteria might be. Last week,
our acid-fast stain left us confused in which direction to take our initial
hypothesis on what our bacterium could be. This week, with further testing, we
can begin to eliminate a few options and narrow our ideas. We found that our
bacterium was catalase positive, and both aerobic and anaerobic. This narrows
down our options to Actinomyces spp.,
and Peptococcus spp. However, further
tests need to be done in order to solidify our observations. More tests will be
needed and may lead us to reevaluate our hypothesis. But, as of right now, our
tests have shown us that our bacterium could be either Actinomyces spp. or Peptococcus
spp.
No comments:
Post a Comment